From: Rocco R21 (roccor21@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 14 2007 - 16:23:46 ART
>Hi All,
I was able to configure MQC FRTS so I would not have to use
>frame-relay interface-dlci on the physical interface. Anybody know if
>the two different types of configurations below accomplish the same
>results?
MQC: !
>class-map match-all FRTS304
> match fr-dlci 304
>class-map match-all FRTS305
> match fr-dlci 305
>!
>!
>policy-map FRTS
> class FRTS304
>shape average 1024000 128000 65000
> class FRTS305
>shape average 512000 64000 129000
>!
>interface Serial1/0
> ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
>encapsulation frame-relay
>frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.4 304
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.5 305
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
> service-policy output FRTS
Legacy:
interface Serial1/0
> ip address 1.1.1.3 255.255.255.0
>encapsulation frame-relay
>no fair-queue
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.4 304
> frame-relay map ip 1.1.1.5 305
> frame-relay interface-dlci 304
>class FRTS304
> frame-relay interface-dlci 305
>class FRTS305
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> frame-relay lmi-type cisco
>!!
>map-class frame-relay FRTS304
> frame-relay cir 1024000
> frame-relay bc 128000
> frame-relay be 65000
>!
>map-class frame-relay FRTS305
> frame-relay cir 512000
> frame-relay bc 64000
> frame-relay be 129000
>! Thanks, rr
>
>_______________________________________________________________________
>Subscription information may be found at:
>http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Feb 08 2007 - 23:46:56 ART