Re: Administrative distance of static route

From: Sadiq Yakasai (sadiqtanko@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Feb 23 2007 - 15:36:01 ART


hmmm :s, but isnt the route showing an AD of 1 though? and since the route
points to a logically connected interface, i would think it shud have an AD
of 0 too.

Sadiq

On 2/23/07, Hash Aminu <hashng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> hey Dump :))
>
> static routes pointing to the interface is considered directly connected
> thats why its haviong an AD of 0 and the normal static route have an AD of
> 1
> which is pointing to the router's forwarding address
>
> HTH
>
> hash
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Mar 01 2007 - 07:38:48 ART