Tunnel keepalives

From: Piotr Ojczyk (pojczyk@tlen.pl)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2007 - 19:44:26 ART

• Next message: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: PIX & ASA: Destination NAT (Possible?)"
• Previous message: Jeff Mullan: "Re: Question on Redistribute Connected"
• Next in thread: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Sean C: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Piotr Ojczyk: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: istong@stong.org: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello,

When there are a few tunnels configured with the same time interval, the
keepalives are sent simultaneously for all the interfaces. It causes quite
inconvenient situation when very big number of tunnels is used - a storm of
keepalives is then generated followed by the long idle time. Especially when
all the responding routers are connected to a multi-access network and try
to reply immediately causing collisions.

Is there any possibility to spread tunnel keepalives to be sent in different
time?

Thanks
Piotr

• Next message: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: PIX & ASA: Destination NAT (Possible?)"
• Previous message: Jeff Mullan: "Re: Question on Redistribute Connected"
• Next in thread: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Sean C: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Sergey Golovanov: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: Piotr Ojczyk: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Maybe reply: istong@stong.org: "Re: Tunnel keepalives"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:50 ART