RE: shaping and FR

From: Obi Nnaya (obi.nnaya@nayatronix.com)
Date: Sat Mar 10 2007 - 00:33:23 ART

Next message: yousef mohammed: "Re: Neighbor Command in OSPF"
Previous message: Jeff Mullan: "Re: BGP Bestpath selection -- confused with attributes"
Maybe in reply to: Obi Nnaya: "shaping and FR"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Shuka,

Thanks for your response.

Cheers

Obi

________________________________

From: Prashant Shukla [mailto:shukla_cisco@yahoo.co.in]
Sent: Fri 09/03/2007 18:04
To: Obi Nnaya; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: shaping and FR

Hi Obi,

In case of FR traffic shaping, we generally give the service policy to the FR
interface in order to impact all the traffic for that interface and in turn
will impact all traffic for all DLCIs attached .

BUT, in case you have ,say, 3 DLCI for which you would like to use different
shaping values for different DLCIs then we attached the service policy to the
"interface-dlci" value rather than at interface level.

HTH

Shukla.

Obi Nnaya <obi.nnaya@nayatronix.com> wrote:

Hi,

        When shaping and there a FR interface involved, does it matter whether
        the service-policy is applied to the physical interface or a map-class
        applied to the frame-relay interface-dlci?

Thankyou

nayatronix

        _______________________________________________________________________
        Subscription information may be found at:
        http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

________________________________

Here's a new way to find what you're looking for - Yahoo! Answers
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/in/yanswers/*http://in.answers.yahoo.com/>

Next message: yousef mohammed: "Re: Neighbor Command in OSPF"
Previous message: Jeff Mullan: "Re: BGP Bestpath selection -- confused with attributes"
Maybe in reply to: Obi Nnaya: "shaping and FR"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Apr 01 2007 - 06:35:50 ART