Re: IPv6 anycast vs. proxy arp best practice? No need for IPv6

From: John Gibson (johngibson1541@yahoo.com)
Date: Thu May 24 2007 - 17:03:27 ART

• Next message: Josh Carlson: "IP TV QoS"
• Previous message: Ovidiu Neghina: "ip tcp intercept + nat"
• Maybe in reply to: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "IPv6 anycast vs. proxy arp best practice? No need for IPv6"
• Next in thread: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: IPv6 anycast vs. proxy arp best practice? No need for IPv6"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think my subject line didn't even make any sense.

I don't know how to utilize anycast in networking.

John

• Next message: Josh Carlson: "IP TV QoS"
• Previous message: Ovidiu Neghina: "ip tcp intercept + nat"
• Maybe in reply to: johngibson1541@yahoo.com: "IPv6 anycast vs. proxy arp best practice? No need for IPv6"
• Next in thread: Tarun Pahuja: "Re: IPv6 anycast vs. proxy arp best practice? No need for IPv6"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Jun 01 2007 - 06:55:22 ART