From: Serhat Aslan (serhatworks@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2007 - 14:13:01 ART
 Those are the not configs that I wanted, I mean the  running-config. If you
can ping ->from serial interface of R4-R5 to loopback of routers, and if
there is no error the  separation and mapping with access-lists on both
RP(s) and agent configuration, the system must work. It is very straight
forward configuration.
Serhat Aslan
On 8/7/07, ISolveSystems <support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
>
> Below shows R4 R5 pim enabled interfaces and neighbours.  What other
> config do you want?
>
> *R4*
>
> Rack1R4#sh ip pim int
>
> Address          Interface                Ver/   Nbr    Query  DR     DR
>                                           Mode   Count  Intvl  Prior
> 174.1.4.4        FastEthernet0/0          v2/SD  0      30     1
> 174.1.4.4
> 174.1.145.4      Serial0/0/0              v2/SD  2      30     0
> 174.1.145.1
>
> Rack1R4(config)#do sh ip pim nei
> PIM Neighbor Table
> Mode: B - Bidir Capable, DR - Designated Router, N - Default DR Priority,
>       S - State Refresh Capable
> Neighbor          Interface                Uptime/Expires    Ver   DR
> Address
> Prio/Mode
> 174.1.145.1       Serial0/0/0              00:52:30/00:01:27 v2    1 / DR
> S
> 174.1.145.5       Serial0/0/0              00:52:31/00:01:27 v2    0 / S
>
> *R5*
>
> Rack1R5#sh ip pim int
>
> Address          Interface                Ver/   Nbr    Query  DR     DR
>                                           Mode   Count  Intvl  Prior
> 174.1.145.5      Serial0/0/0              v2/SD  2      30     0
> 174.1.145.1
> 192.10.1.5       FastEthernet0/1.52       v2/SD  0      30     1
> 192.10.1.5
> Rack1R5#ping 150.1.1.1
>
>
>
>
>
> On 8/7/07, Serhat Aslan <serhatworks@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >  Did you check the unicast reachability of rp/agent to clients and pim
> > enable interfaces ?  if you did can you send the config ?
> >
> >
> > Serhat Aslan
> >
> >
> >  On 8/7/07, ISolveSystems < support@isolvesystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I have tried the nbmp mode with same result.
> > >
> > > I have the broadcase keyword...
> > > frame-relay map ip 174.1.145.4 104 broadcast
> > > frame-relay map ip 174.1.145.5 105 broadcast
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/7/07, Salau, Yemi < yemi.salau@siemens.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > 1. tried ip pim nbma-mode on R1's serial interface?
> > > > 2. Sure the FR interfaces/dlcis are broadcast compatible? ie.
> > > > Frame-relay map with broadcast keyword?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com ] On
> > > Behalf Of
> > > > ISolveSystems
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 3:43 PM
> > > > To: Group study
> > > > Subject: RP mapping info not received
> > > >
> > > > Hello Expert,
> > > > R1, R4, R5 are full meshed FR.   R1 is the RP.  R3 is the mapping
> > > agent.
> > > > All connected interfaces are configured with pim sparse dense mode
> > > and
> > > > are
> > > > all neighbor up.
> > > >
> > > > For some reason R4 and R5 are not receiving rp mapping from R3.  Any
> > > > idea?
> > > >
> > > > R4
> > > >    \
> > > >     \
> > > >      R1-----R3----R2
> > > >      /
> > > >     /
> > > > R5
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:09 ART