Re: iewb-v3 vol2 lab4 task 2.2

From: NITIN NITIN (ccie_study_123@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Aug 13 2007 - 16:33:56 ART

Next message: Alt, Ryan: "RE: R@S Lab Dates in San Jose"
Previous message: Julio Carrasco: "IEWB v4 lab 13 tack 6.3"
Maybe in reply to: slevin kremera: "iewb-v3 vol2 lab4 task 2.2"
Next in thread: slevin kremera: "Re: iewb-v3 vol2 lab4 task 2.2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Coz Q says

  use PHYSICAL int
  dont use no frame inver arp ip commnad
  and learn dynamically


  using physical you learn other dlci except those you want
  soblack hole those DLCI on multipoint interface ( that not reqiored)
  Please let me know if still issues

  Regards

slevin kremera <slevin.kremera@gmail.com> wrote:
i dont understand why did they make it multipoint....it was easy with full
frame-relay interface

Next message: Alt, Ryan: "RE: R@S Lab Dates in San Jose"
Previous message: Julio Carrasco: "IEWB v4 lab 13 tack 6.3"
Maybe in reply to: slevin kremera: "iewb-v3 vol2 lab4 task 2.2"
Next in thread: slevin kremera: "Re: iewb-v3 vol2 lab4 task 2.2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART