From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Wed Aug 15 2007 - 00:56:50 ART
That's correct.. but if you are sending this snippet to your boss, its
ip pim sparse-mode
You forgot the "S" superman!
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
slevin kremera
Sent: Tuesday, August 14, 2007 11:21 PM
To: ccie1101
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: Q on interface command point-to-point ...
once u declare int s1/0.1 point-to-point after that even if u just type int
ser1/0.1 it does not make any big difference becos it is already declared
point-point
On 8/15/07, ccie1101 <ccie1101@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> This might be a real silly question but better to ask then not ask
> ...
>
> Here is my q ....
>
> 1) Is there any difference in doing Case 1 and Case 2 ? Both ways work but
> just wondering if there is any subtle difference if I dont do it as in
> Case
> 1 ? The difference that I am referring to is that do we need to explicitly
> call the interface 'int s1/0.1 point-to-point' or would it be okay just
> to call it 'int s1/0.1' ?
>
>
> *Case 1*
> int s1/0.1 point-to-point
> ip pim spare-mode
>
> OR
>
> *Case 2*
> int s1/0.1
> ip pim spare-mode
>
> Pls advice,
>
> Cheers,
>
> ccie1101
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Sep 01 2007 - 11:32:11 ART