From: Jonny English (redkidneybeans@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 03 2007 - 22:23:49 ART
If you do a show traffic-shape you will see the answer to your questions.
We'll thats assuming i've understood what your question was.
hope this helps. Maybe someone can explain this if you don't see the answer
from the output. I don't have the output for the show command with me.
On 9/4/07, Julio Carrasco <julio.carrasco@ya.com> wrote:
>
> Anyway, when I configure, a class for the main interface, ehach DLCIs,
> gets
> the CIR I have configured, or the cir, is shared between all the DLCIs.
>
> In example, If I configure the class REMAINING_BW ass follows:
>
> map-class frame-relay REMAINING_BW
> cir 256000
> bc 2560
>
> interface serial0/0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip address 132.1.123.1 255.255.255.0
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay class REMAINING_BW
> !
> and I have DLCIs 204 and 205 associated to that interface, will each DLCI
> have a cir of 256000 (256000 x 2 = 512000 cir assigned to the main
> interface)
>
> Or will be the CIR shared between the two DLCIs, beign 256000 the CIR
> assigned to the main interface ??
>
> TIA
> Julio
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Julio Carrasco" <julio.carrasco@ya.com>
> To: "Shine Joseph" <shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au>; "'Jonny English'"
> <redkidneybeans@gmail.com>
> Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 2:32 AM
> Subject: Re: Lab 2 Task 2.4 IEWB 4.1
>
>
> > You are both right,
> >
> > Thank you guys.
> > I will have to lear to read better or I will fail.
> >
> > Regards.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Shine Joseph" <shinepjoseph@iprimus.com.au>
> > To: "'Jonny English'" <redkidneybeans@gmail.com>; "'Julio Carrasco'"
> > <julio.carrasco@ya.com>
> > Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 12:43 AM
> > Subject: RE: Lab 2 Task 2.4 IEWB 4.1
> >
> >
> >> Jonny is right.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> >> Jonny English
> >> Sent: Tuesday, 4 September 2007 7:47 AM
> >> To: Julio Carrasco
> >> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> >> Subject: Re: Lab 2 Task 2.4 IEWB 4.1
> >>
> >> If i remember correctly, I did this lab a while ago and don't have it
> in
> >> front of me, but I remember the question saying half the remaining
> >> bandwidth.
> >>
> >> so you would calculate 384 then divide that by 2 to get 192.
> >>
> >> Thats they way I figured it out when i did the lab. Someone correct me
> if
> >> I'm wrong.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>
> >> On 9/4/07, Julio Carrasco <julio.carrasco@ya.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Group,
> >>>
> >>> I was rereading the the labs of the IEWB and I have seen, that,the
> task
> >>> 2.4,
> >>> they have user a CIR of 192000 for the remaining bandwidth class on R2
> >>> and
> >>> R4.
> >>> The task states that DLCI 204 on router 2, and DLCI 402 on router 4
> have
> >>> a
> >>> provisioned CIR of 128 kbps, and that the port speed is a speed of 512
> >>> kbps.
> >>>
> >>> And they say that you have to allocate the remaining bandwidth (in
> fact,
> >>> in
> >>> the task they say the port speed minus the provisioned CIR) for the
> rest
> >>> of
> >>> the DLCIs.
> >>>
> >>> I did it using 384 kbps for the REMAINING_BW class, but they use
> >>> 192kbps.
> >>>
> >>> Is this a mistake, or I have miss something ??
> >>>
> >>> TIA
> >>>
> >>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:09 ART