From: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez (nergal888@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 08 2007 - 13:27:42 ART
Summarizing nasty redistribution:
Pointing in the tipical example with two routers running two routing
protocols who are doing mutual redistribution between them, I conclude the
following steps:
It is a MUST to tag routes learned from one routing protocol to the other
(with the permit and deny actions), tagging a route in routing protocol X,
and deny that same route learned through routing protocol Y.
Pay Attention to routing protocols who use internal and external
administrative distances (sometimes you must modify distance in a global way
mean for the entire routing protocol, and sometimes you must modiffy the
distance learned from a particular neighbor.
Think, the best example to understand routing redistribution using the
features mentioned above is the lab 15 I.E. ver 3, redist between R4 and R3.
and finally must follow the logic of the path, mean the best path to reach
certain destination network.
Please correct me i Im wrong??
Any other thing would you like to aggregate??
Any comment would apprecite.
Thanks.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART