From: Carlos Trujillo Jimenez (nergal888@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Sep 10 2007 - 01:48:46 ART
Hi all.
Im Little confused at the labs, since looking at the beggining of all the
labs the task ask to disable frame relay inverse arp at the physical
interface and we simply create a frame relay map pointing to the next hop ip
address thus disabling the frame relay inverse arp, Things work with
successful pings from directly connected neighbors.
Next topic of the same lab ask to enable ospf, and we change the interface
type based on the defined task, making the things work becoming succesfully
adjacent directly connected neighbors over the nbma cloud.
Now.... at a far task, it prompts to enable frame relay traffic shaping at a
circuit level, mean a cir for a specified dlci, different to a cir of
another dlci, who both dlcis live in the same physical interface.
Now there begins the problem, since we must configure the traffic shaping
characteristics (cir, bc, be) between different dlcis in the same physical
interface, we must change or dont know if it is better said "UNDO" some
configurations who are already working at the beggining tasks, for example:
config withouth the traffic shaping task (before traffic shaping):
int ser 0/0
no frame relay inverse arp
frame relay map ip 192.168.1.3 100
frame relay map ip 192.168.1.5 200
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint nonbroadcast
router ospf 1
neighbor 192.168.1.3 cost 95
neighbor 192.168.1.3 cost 170
config with the traffic shaping task (after traffic shaping):
int ser 0/0
no frame relay inverse arp
frame relay interface dlci 100
class SHAPE-DLCI100
frame relay interface dlci 200
class SHAPE-DLCI200
frame relay traffic shaping
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint nonbroadcast
router ospf 1
neighbor 192.168.1.3 cost 95
neighbor 192.168.1.3 cost 170
Doing the configuration for the traffic shaping , involves changes of the
commands "frame relay map" resplaced with the command "frame relay interface
dlci", thus disabling the ospf neighbor relationship between directly
connected routers.
ANY IDEAS?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:10 ART