From: Peter Kingston (kingstonp.ccie@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Sep 13 2007 - 06:25:33 ART
Whoops, I shouldn't respond to e-mails while tired.
On 9/13/07, Peter Kingston <kingstonp.ccie@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I am under the impression that changing your network type on the ethernet
> network to point-to-multipoint would stop R4 from handing out R10's ip
> address as the next hop
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Peter Kingston
> Studying my CCIE
>
>
> On 9/13/07, Max Braun <r_s_lab@mail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Give me the right config ;)
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ed Lui"
> > To: "Max Braun"
> > Subject: Re: rip neighbors problem
> > Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:15:45 -0700
> >
> > Hi Max,
> >
> > That is not true. The next hop can be changed on R3 from R10 to R4.
> >
> > Ed
> >
> > On 9/12/07, Max Braun < r_s_lab@mail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Guys!
> >
> > When I began this research, I thought that I was mistake in
> > something. But now I know that with my topology I can't change my
> > next hop. R3 see the update from R4, but R4 give the address of
> > R10, and because they on the same Ethernet segment - R3 always
> > send packets directly to R10.
> >
> > It can not be changed any local or traffic policing.
> >
> > Thank you all!
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Max Braun
> >
> >
> > -- We've Got Your Name @ Mail.com !!!
> > Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Max Braun
> >
> > --
> > We've Got Your Name @ www.mail.com!!!
> > Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
>
>
>
-- Regards,Peter Kingston Studying my CCIE
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:11 ART