From: Ed Lui (edwlui@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 14 2007 - 15:00:52 ART
Hi Max,
I don't have time to lab it up again. Anyway, set up passive interface on R10
and nei to R4. Again, set up pass interface on R4 plus nei to R3. Summarize
the address 10.10.10.0/24 on the interface.
Let me know if that works for you.
Ed
----- Original Message -----
From: Max Braun
To: Ed Lui
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2007 1:31 AM
Subject: Re: rip neighbors problem
Give me the right config ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ed Lui"
To: "Max Braun"
Subject: Re: rip neighbors problem
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 23:15:45 -0700
Hi Max,
That is not true. The next hop can be changed on R3 from R10 to R4.
Ed
On 9/12/07, Max Braun < r_s_lab@mail.com> wrote:
Hi, Guys!
When I began this research, I thought that I was mistake in something.
But now I know that with my topology I can't change my next hop. R3 see the
update from R4, but R4 give the address of R10, and because they on the same
Ethernet segment - R3 always send packets directly to R10.
It can not be changed any local or traffic policing.
Thank you all!
Best regards,
Max Braun
--
We've Got Your Name @ Mail.com !!!
Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
Best regards,
Max Braun
--
We've Got Your Name @ Mail.com !!!
Get a FREE E-mail Account Today - Choose From 100+ Domains
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:11 ART