From: Bill Mckenzie (bmckenzie@hotmail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 22 2007 - 11:28:50 ART
Contracting is such a scary thought due to lack of benefits and depending on
location...lack of opportunity. Bill Mckenzie, CCIE#16725, CCVP,CCSPSr.
Network Engineer> To: wrsteve33-gsccie@yahoo.com> CC: ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: Hurry up and get your number before its too late!> Date: Sat, 22
Sep 2007 15:21:26 +0100> From: gary.duncanson@googlemail.com> > I think we may
find more CCIE's going contract as opposed to taking perm > gigs in the years
ahead because of the money.> > Higher numbers do not necessarily mean less
experienced people so it's a > little flawed as a means of filtering
candidates.> ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wes Stevens"
<wrsteve33-gsccie@yahoo.com>> To: "Gregory Gombas" <ggombas@gmail.com>> Cc:
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>> Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 3:08 PM> Subject:
Re: Hurry up and get your number before its too late!> > > > There are two
things wrong with this ad. The first is that they are using > > when you got
your number as a prerequisite for the job. There are a lot of > > good ccie's
out there with higher numbers for sure and I would bet some > > not so good
ones with lower numbers. This just says they don't have the > > experience to
know the difference. Do you really want to work for a firm > > like that?> >>
> The second is that they are paying starvation wages. 125k in nj - not very >
> good pay for the cost of living there....> >> > ----- Original Message ---->
> From: Gregory Gombas <ggombas@gmail.com>> > To: Cisco certification
<ccielab@groupstudy.com>> > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 10:10:45 AM> >
Subject: Hurry up and get your number before its too late!> >> >> > Check out
this job ad - says they prefer CCIE below 15000. I remember> > a few years ago
they wanted CCIE's below 10000. Next it will be below> > 20000 - hope I make
that threshold!> >> >
http://seeker.dice.com/jobsearch/servlet/JobSearch?op=101&dockey=xml/f/6/f6da
82e500534edb88b4d2ab26945b0f@endecaindex&c=1&source=20> >> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:15 ART