From: Darby Weaver (darbyweaver@yahoo.com)
Date: Sun Sep 30 2007 - 01:12:49 ART
Narbik,
In fairness to Victor, Brad, Yourself and even me - I
ask that you look at the posts that I made to you and
to GS.
Look carefuly, posts that were unicast were returned
unicast and posts that were not unicast were replied
as they were sent and in no case were any other people
addded to the list by me.
Just because you may have received a given email does
not mean the entire group did.
While it is not personally my business other than
being asked for help by Victor - I do have a little
more insight as an outsider looking in - now I could
elaborate even more and bring out more issues with
this entire tale, but as you said some things are
better left unsaid.
The final of the matter is I do apologize for
mentioning your name - but since you had replied to
the group, I did the same - this seems typical to me
in most instances. My queries were intended to be
public and as such they were as intended.
I do have more on this matter and written, but as you
say we are on GS and it is not necessarily a public
matter. Thankfully, I save my emails, I have a pretty
good history of this entire story from beginning to
date. But it may not be proper for the entire GS
community as you say. It does bring into question a
few things about the entire community and the way
things are said and done (and by whom).
But in any future posts by me, I will respect your
wishes and make a point to leave your name out of
them.
I actually was trying to bow out of this, but now
you've got me collecting my thoughts, emails, and my
knowledge of things...
And to Brad, I must say that all of my personal
dealings have been very fair and upfront, with
complete honesty.
--- Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com> wrote:
> To everyone that read this thread.
>
> I have no longer *any problems* with Brad, every
> class that i taught i got
> paid and i got paid in time, the issue that i had
> with Brad was regarding
> some Work Books and it was kinda personal, the issue
> is no longer there, and
> once again this was between Brad and I and i think
> that we are both happy
> about our existing relationship.
>
> I am totally sorry that Darby did this, i did not
> ask him to do this, but in
> defense of Brad "VICOTR IS NO MAMA TREASA ANY WAY".
>
> So please let's end this conversation, i was a bit
> upset when i got the
> e-mail from Victor, him being in Venezuela with kids
> and no job, and i was
> just shooting shi.. with Victor BUT i think Darby
> was way out of line to put
> our personal conversation on the GS. And I think he
> should apologies
> publicly.
>
> But no one knows the true story between them and
> let's say that there are
> three sides to every story Victor's, Darby's and the
> truth.
>
> Once again Brad has always paid his instructors in
> time, as a matter of fact
> he pays on the last day, versus other vendors that
> pay in 30 or 40 days.
> PLEASE DO NOT INCLUDE ME IN THIS CONVERSATION ANY
> MORE.
>
> I am very P O ed by what Darby did. It was not
> called for and it was not
> fair.
>
>
> On 9/29/07, Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I was consulted on the matter. I also replied to
> you
> > privately as well.
> >
> > However, if anyone has a gripe and it is not being
> > taken care of, please feel free to ask me and if
> time
> > permits and the facts seem worthy - I can do
> wonders
> > with words sometimes.
> >
> > Hey, this is where CCIE customers are and if
> > misunderstandings like this get resolved quickly
> and
> > efficiently, then where else can both sides show
> their
> > case and get near-immediate results.
> >
> > This problem is one that can be relatively easily
> > resolved.
> >
> > And when done so - everyone benefits.
> >
> > We all like to know our vendors are fair and
> honest
> > people.
> >
> > If handled correctly, things get better - not
> worse.
> >
> >
> > --- Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Are you being the Geraldo Rivera of the CCIE
> world?
> > > :)
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
> > > [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > > Darby Weaver
> > > Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 3:07 PM
> > > To: Darby Weaver; Victor Cappuccio
> > > Cc: Jay.Hanke@alltel.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > > Subject: Re: NLI R&S volume 7 Lab 35
> > >
> > > Is anyone from NLI around who knows the story
> and
> > > cares to comment and
> > > clarify this situation?
> > >
> > > Two very prominent Cisco Certified Instructors:
> > >
> > > Narbik Kocharians and Victor Cappuccio are
> saying
> > > that they both did work
> > > for NLI, and both are saying that they were not
> paid
> > > for at least some
> > > portion of the work they did or were contracted
> to
> > > do.
> > >
> > > Is this true?
> > >
> > > Is NLI the only CCIE Prep Center not paying its
> > > instructors or workbook
> > > writers? Are there others?
> > >
> > >
> > > How deep is this story?
> > >
> > >
> > > --- Darby Weaver <darbyweaver@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > How would Victor know the password?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --- Victor Cappuccio <vcappuccio@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Jay the password for lab 35 is secret, I
> hope
> > > this helps at this
> > > > > time Yes it was something I did not
> intentionaly
> > > and
> > > > did
> > > > > not place that in the
> > > > > wording of lab 35
> > > > >
> > > > > I am not working any longer in ccbootcamp
> and I
> > > am looking for a
> > > > > job. and Brad, I need my CCSI Number to be
> > > released from
> > > > NLI
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Victor Cappuccio
> > > > > www.vcappuccio.wordpress.com
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/28/07, Darby Weaver
> <darbyweaver@yahoo.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You might ask Victor C. - I think he may
> know
> > > > > somthing
> > > > > > of this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But I'm not sure if he's still working or
> > > > > associated
> > > > > > with NLI.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --- Jay.Hanke@alltel.com wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > There is an enable secret in the default
> > > > configs
> > > > > for
> > > > > > > the routers and
> > > > > > > switches that has caught me by surprise
> > > after
> > > > a
> > > > > > > reload! I'm working
> > > > > > > through the lab now. If anyone knows the
> > > > enable
> > > > > > > secret it would save me
> > > > > > > a lot of rework!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > jay
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
****************************************************************************
> > > *
> > > > > > > *************
> > > > > > > The information contained in this
> message,
> > > > > including
> > > > > > > attachments, may contain
> > > > > > > privileged or confidential information
> that
> > > is intended to be
> > > > > > > delivered only to the person identified
> > > above. If you are not
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > intended
> > > > > > > recipient, or the person
> > > > > > > responsible for delivering this message
> to
> > > the intended
> > > > > > > recipient, Alltel requests that you
> > > immediately notify the
> > > > > > > sender and
> > > > asks
> > > > > that
> > > > > > > you do not read the
> > > > > > > message or its
> > > > > > > attachments, and that you delete them
> > > without copying or sending
> > > > > > > them to anyone else.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 06 2007 - 12:01:17 ART