From: ruth@mycomputer.co.uk
Date: Thu Oct 04 2007 - 17:37:14 ART
Yes Gary - I think I understand the implications now :) !
Thanks everyone
----- Original Message ----
From: Gary Duncanson
<gary.duncanson@googlemail.com>
To: "ruth@mycomputer.co.uk"
<rswgreat@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Thursday, 4 October,
2007 9:27:05 PM
Subject: Re: Traffic Shaping
Hi Ruth,
You will be doing
this in interface mode won't you?
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1/qos/configuration/guide/qcdgts.html#
wp1000916
In which case I imagine the implicit deny any at the end of an ACL
will
require the permit.
----- Original Message -----
From:
"ruth@mycomputer.co.uk" <rswgreat@yahoo.co.uk>
To: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:50 PM
Subject: Traffic Shaping
> Hi
>
> I
have the following statement on an interface, I am trying to shape
>
everything but voice:-
>
> traffic-shape group 101 7000000 700000 7000000 1000
> and my access-list is as follows:-
>
> access-list 101 deny udp any host
>
200.0.0.4 range 16384 32767
> access-list 101 permit ip any host 200.0.0.4
>
>
My
> question is do I need the second line of my ACL? since I am not applying
> the
> ACL to an interface as such, I just don't want to include the voice
>
traffic in
> the traffic shaping?
>
> Thanks
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:12 ART