From: Cagri Yucel (cyucel@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2007 - 11:56:10 ART
Chaps, any idea on below ? Why the route with lower localpref and higher
metric is preferred as best ?
Both has next hop reachability and both has weight 0.
Many thanks,
BGP routing table entry for 24867:522:10.3.3.0/24, version 161558
Paths: (2 available, best #2, table ciptex-vrf)
Not advertised to any peer
Local, imported path from 24867:12000:10.3.3.0/24
85.133.21.1 (metric 61) from 62.140.218.2 (62.140.218.2)
Origin incomplete, metric 10, localpref 120, valid, internal
Extended Community: RT:24867:12000
Originator: 85.133.21.1, Cluster list: 0.0.0.102
mpls labels in/out nolabel/277
Local, imported path from 24867:12005:10.3.3.0/24
62.140.219.20 (metric 111) from 62.140.218.2 (62.140.218.2)
Origin incomplete, metric 10, localpref 100, valid, internal, best
Extended Community: RT:24867:12005 Cost:pre-bestpath:129:281856
0x8800:0:0 0x8801:302:25856 0x8802:65281:256000 0x8803:65281:1500
0x8804:0:2887647242 0x8805:3:0
Originator: 62.140.219.20, Cluster list: 0.0.0.102, 0.0.0.101
mpls labels in/out nolabel/47
-- -cagri
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Fri Nov 16 2007 - 13:11:17 ART