From: Tarun Pahuja (pahujat@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Nov 03 2007 - 15:44:30 ART
Jeff,
Sometimes you can avoid all the confussion by just looking at
the number of points for the question. A one line answer would not be
worth as much as a 10 line answer.
HTH,
Tarun
On 11/2/07, R.S CCIE <r.s.cciestudy@gmail.com> wrote:
> Joe,
>
> [quote]
> "read the question again" or "you're not the first person
> to be tested on that rack"
> [/quote]
>
> Did they treat you like that when you were there at SJ?
>
> Horrible!
>
> Ed
>
> On 11/2/07, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com> wrote:
> >
> > They would slam you for not knowing the simple way of local-as.
> >
> > IMHO you would get "read the question again" or "you're not the first
> > person
> > to be tested on that rack"
> >
> > -J
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Biggs, Jeff (M/CIO/BIE)
> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 9:55 AM
> > To: smorris@ipexpert.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: LAB 21 BGP solution
> >
> > Thanks Scott. I definitely believe in he KISS principle, but could I
> > possibly ask the proctor to clarify this situation or would that be
> > "against the rules"?
> >
> >
> > Jeffrey Biggs
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > USAID
> > M/CIO/BIE
> > 240-646-5003
> > jbiggs@usaid.gov
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Morris [mailto:smorris@ipexpert.com]
> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 10:44 AM
> > To: Biggs, Jeff (M/CIO/BIE); ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: RE: LAB 21 BGP solution
> >
> > IMHO that would possibly require some extra work or thinking.
> > Confederations change the entire structure where if you had multiple
> > eBGP
> > neighbors, it would affect them as well. Local-as affects a per-peer
> > configuration only which makes it a little simpler.
> >
> > In this example, both would accomplish the same thing though, just be
> > aware
> > of the potential difficulties moving forward!
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> > JNCIE-M
> > #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> > VP - Technical Training - IPexpert, Inc.
> > IPexpert Sr. Technical Instructor
> >
> > A Cisco Learning Partner - We Accept Learning Credits!
> >
> > smorris@ipexpert.com
> >
> > Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
> > Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> > http://www.ipexpert.com
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> > Biggs, Jeff (M/CIO/BIE)
> > Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 9:39 AM
> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: LAB 21 BGP solution
> >
> > I see that the solution uses LOCAL-AS NO-PREPEND, but I set it up using
> > CONFEDERATIONS and got the same result.
> >
> >
> >
> > R7# show ip bgp
> >
> > Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> >
> > *> 172.16.0.0 10.10.10.6 50 0 600 i
> >
> > * 10.10.10.5 100 0 600
> > i
> >
> > *> 172.16.1.0/24 10.10.10.6 150 0 600 i
> >
> > *> 172.16.2.0/24 10.10.10.6 50 0 600 i
> >
> > *> 172.16.3.0/24 10.10.10.6 50 0 600 i
> >
> > * 172.16.4.0/24 10.10.10.6 100 0 600 i
> >
> > *> 10.10.10.5 50 0 600
> > i
> >
> > *> 192.168.22.0 10.10.10.8 0 0 400 i
> >
> > r7#
> >
> >
> >
> > Would this be considered acceptable since there is no mention of not
> > being
> > able to use confederations or explicit use of local-as?
> >
> >
> >
> > Jeffrey Biggs
> >
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> >
> > USAID
> >
> > M/CIO/BIE
> >
> > 240-646-5003
> >
> > jbiggs@usaid.gov <mailto:jbiggs@usaid.gov>
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:27 ART