From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 23 2007 - 15:29:36 ART
You are incorrect, i have tested this lab, what i quoted was part of my work
book, and it works all day every day.
You can do standard community-lists in two different ways, numbered and
named, i have used named community-list, you can also use numbered if you
wanted.
On 11/23/07, Gupta, Gopal (NWCC) <gopal.gupta@hp.com> wrote:
>
> The way you are applying Community is not correct
> Actually match statement matches only on community list and not directly
> the vlaue.
>
> So, use community list and then match that community list it would work.
>
> HTH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Vladimir Sousa
> Sent: Friday, November 23, 2007 21:38
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: BGP communities - match on a route-map
> Importance: Low
>
> Im trying to match a community string on a route-map in a BGP neighbor
> and its not working
>
> basically:
>
> r6#sh ip bgp 192.0.8.0/21
> BGP routing table entry for 192.0.8.0/21, version 28
> Paths: (2 available, best #2, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
> Advertised to non peer-group peers:
> 10.0.200.2
> 200 100, (aggregated by 100 192.0.12.1)
> 10.0.200.2 from 10.0.200.2 (10.0.2.1)
> Origin IGP, localpref 100, valid, external
> Community: 10:10
>
> R2 - > R6
>
> neighbor 10.0.200.2 route-map rm_from_r2 in
>
> route-map rm_from_r2 permit 10
> match community 10:10
> set weight 10000
>
> Why the weight is not being set?
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
-- Narbik Kocharians CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security) CCSI# 30832 www.Net-WorkBooks.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Dec 01 2007 - 06:37:31 ART