From: Tarun Pahuja (pahujat@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Dec 03 2007 - 15:28:27 ART
You sure will!
There are many issues that revolve around dynamic and static entries.
Please read the last paragraph of this link and you will get a better
understanding.
<http://juniper.cluepon.net/index.php/Olive>
http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=170741&seqNum=4&rl=1
HTH,
Tarun
On Dec 3, 2007 12:08 PM, <ladeegeek@gmail.com> wrote:
> The LMI is communicating between the local frame switch and router. I
> have a question about config verification and point structure. If I have a
> main serial interface in the default nbma mode and no inverse arp I will not
> get any dynmaic maps. No maps show up with sho frame map - as expected.
> The sho lmi displays my communication to the frame switch is opperational -
> as expected. BUT when I do a sho frame pvc - my pvc table is populated.
>
> I'm thinking that is the exact way it should show up. No maps, my LMI
> connection active and the PVC table populated by the LMI data.
>
> Is there any way I would lose points on a router configured as such if the
> requirements were to not allow dynamic mappings? Should I be trying to find
> a way to control the LMI too?
>
> It's a matter of symantics. There are no dynamic mappings, but my DLCI's
> and associated PVCs are dynamic?
>
> Thanks for the input.
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST