From: Tarun Pahuja (pahujat@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 06 2007 - 11:24:04 ART
VSS is a Win Win solution if you have the money for it.
http://www.cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/products/ps9336/c2134/cdccont_0900aecd806ee2d4.pdf
"VSS increases operational efficiency
1) Single point of management including configuration
2) Single gateway IP address (eliminates Hot Standby Router Protocol (HSRP)/
Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP)/ Gateway Load Balancing Protocol
(GLBP))
3) Multi-chassis EtherChannel(R) (MEC) creates simplified loop-free
topologies, eliminating the dependency on Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
4) Flexible deployment options in terms of location of the underlying
physical switches as they are connected via standard 10 Gigabit Ethernet
interfaces."
HTH,
Tarun
On 12/6/07, l3type <l3type@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Guys, I know this is a switching question but wanted to get the opinion of
> esteemed experts on this board
>
>
>
> I want to know when should I recommend the 6500 VSS and when to recommend
> the plain 6500's? If there are only advantages to going with VSS, why
> would
> anybody recommend the separate 6500's at the core solution?
>
>
>
> Also, is there a risk going with a new product like the VSS or does Cisco
> have some documented case studies with customers already running it?
>
>
>
>
>
> Or would the best thing to do is to recommend a client to buy VSS-capable
> parts at the moment but run the switches in standalone mode which is
> supposed by Cisco
>
>
>
> Thanks all
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Jan 01 2008 - 12:04:29 ARST