From: Rik Guyler (rik@guyler.net)
Date: Wed Feb 06 2008 - 10:22:32 ARST
Personally I don't like any of those. Don't get me wrong, for lot's of
functionality all of those come with tons of apps and features but for raw
performance, it would be hard to beat a base install of Debian, which is
what Ubuntu is built from. My guest wireless DHCP is provided by a Debian
box running DHCPd and Webmin and it's using a total of 86MB RAM. Try that
with any of the other distros (forget Windows of course). ;-)
It's not quite the click and install that Ubuntu is but the Debian install
is similar to Suse and Fedora in terms of ease. A base install is
especially easy since you don't have to choose any of the packages during
the install.
Rik
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of Gary
Duncanson
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:38 PM
To: CCNP.CCIE9
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Help
Good question
Caldera, Red Hat. There are so many..
----- Original Message -----
From: "CCNP.CCIE9" <ccnp.ccie9@gmail.com>
To: "Radioactive Frog" <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>; <kelly@cliffhanger.com>
Cc: <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: Help
> thx guys
>
> which platform is preferred with the less cpu load fedora or ubuntu or
> SUSE?
>
>
> On 2/5/08, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You should be fine but don't use microsoft crap on that - use linux or
>> any
>> other unix like OS.
>>
>> Cheers
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Mar 01 2008 - 16:54:47 ARST