From: steveaggie@gmail.com
Date: Tue Mar 04 2008 - 18:41:36 ARST
If I remember the lab correctly (it's been a while) there were also 2 points
of mutual redistribution between EIGRP and OSPF on the other side of the
network. I had the same question as you, but I reconciled it by believing
that some of the RIP routes could be advertised into OSPF, redistributed
into EIGRP, then make the loop and come back to the RIP router via OSPF.
And obviously an OSPF route would be preferred to a RIP route due to a lower
AD.
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of John
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 12:22 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: redistribution
I seem to have started to get a handle on route redistribution. Theres one
thing I keep seeing that I can't make sense of. is a router redistributing
ospf and ripv2. On a couple of occasions I've seen ospf redistributed into
rip with a distance of 109. This means that rip routes will have a lower AD
thasn the OSPF routes. Therip network is a stub. what am I missing. I
kind
of get tags, route-maps and the the AD on external routes, bhut I don't get
this.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:52 ART