From: Daniel Valle (danielfrvalle@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 06 2008 - 00:58:34 ARST
Ed,
as far as I know.
1. if you make 80% or more, than you pass no mater what. If there is no
question at all saying the loopback0 of routerX should be assigned to
something specific, ask the proctor. The last time I did the LAB the proctor
said. to put the loopback in the routing protocol the way i though it
should be. If there is no specific question to put the loopback or an
interface. just add it in a way you'll have it in your routing domain.
2. I think you should Stick to what was requested in the lab. Again. ask the
proctor if you feel unsafe about doing extra configs.
imagine you are the one who is evaluating the knowledge of the Mock
attempter and you ask for critical traffic ( IPP=5) and the guy ansewers
with critical, internet and network traffic ( IPP=5,6,7). You can think this
guy does not know what "critical means".... go figure..
3. stick the the DIAGRAM! in the lab, there are messy things to fix so you
can get what is specified in the diagram. I already did the lab and the
initial config does not reflect that should be. I had to make few changes in
order to make it work.
HTH,
Daniel Valle
On 3/5/08, Ed Lui <edwlui@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Group,
>
> I have done a few Mock Labs to prepare my 1st $1400 rack rental in San
> Jose
> early April. And I just recieved the report for my mock lab yesterday. I
> have
> some questions really need your help.
>
> 1. I heard that the general rule in the lab is full ip reachability. So
> if
> only some routers in the lab are running BGP. And I did not bring routes
> advertised by BGP routers and/or BB routers or maybe I did not
> redistribute a
> loopback interface which is not included in any routing prortocol. Am I
> automatically failed the lab even I get 80% or over? Or it is not possible
> to
> get 80% or more?
>
> 2. I would like some clarification on tasks I lost points in the mock
> lab. I
> would really appreciate your input. The question says:
>
> . Network administrators of R6 have been noticing output drops
> accumulating on
> the Frame Relay link to BBI. In order to prevent this
> type of tail drop configure R6 to randomly drop packets before congestion
> happens on the Serial interface's output queue.
> . In order to ensure that critical traffic transiting your network gets
> the
> best service possible configure R6 so that critical traffic will not be
> dropped unless there are 50 packets in the output queue.
> . If there are 70 critical packets in the output queue R6 should randomly
> drop
> 2 out of every 16 of these packets.
> . In the case that there are more than 70 critical packets in the output
> queue, they should all be dropped.
>
> My answer to the task is :
>
> interface Serial0/0
> ip address 54.9.1.6 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> ip summary-address rip 129.9.0.0 255.255.128.0
> random-detect
> random-detect precedence 5 50 70 8
> random-detect precedence 6 50 70 8 <------------------- EXTRA CONFIG
> random-detect precedence 7 50 70 8 <------------------- EXTRA CONFIG
> frame-relay map ip 54.9.1.254 101 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> My question is : Do I get points for this question with the extra lines of
> config indicated?
>
> 3. Task says:
>
> . Configure SWI and SW4 in such a way that R5 E0/0 and SW2 Fa0/20 appear
> directly connected via CDP.
> . If an additional VLAN is needed use VLAN 100.
> Layer 1 connection: R5(e0/0)====SW1====SW4=====(Fa0/20)SW2
>
> "Diagram here http://docs.google.com/Doc?id=dgsxsjvv_44htgh39dp"
>
> I successfully configured a layer 2 tunnel. So that R5 and SW2 see each
> other
> as neighbor according to CDP.
>
> Now, SW2 was pre-congifured with the ip address on interface vlan 58. I
> was
> trying to put the ip address on the Fa0/20 of SW2. SW2 complained about
> duplicate ip address. I then I looked the lab rule as shown below:
>
> Lab Do's and Don'ts:
> . Do not change or add any IP addresses from the initial configuration
> unless
> otherwise specified
> . Do not change any interface encapsulations unless otherwise specified
> . Do not change the console, AUX or VTY passwords or access methods unless
> otherwise specified
> . Do not use any static routes, default routes, default networks, or
> policy
> routing unless otherwise specified
> . Save your configurations often
>
> However, I lost points on this task because "IP address should've been
> configured on SW2's Fa0/20 interface as per diagram, not on Vlan58"
>
> Is it a fair game? Did I miss something. Due to points lost on this task,
> I
> also lost points on other task relied on this task. The reason is "EIGRP
> hellos should've been sent out SW2's Fa0/20 interface, not Vlan58"
>
> Please help,
>
> Lui
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue Apr 01 2008 - 07:53:52 ART