From: Salau, Yemi (yemi.salau@siemens.com)
Date: Fri Apr 04 2008 - 08:23:51 ART
Another way of wording I hate so much ...
Personally, I would enable pim as highlighted by Alex, but then there is
no harm asking the proctor for clarification. Never take that for
granted, even if your proctor came across as unfriendly!
But from my point of view: the statement didn't mention anything about
clients/domain, so I would be less worried about IGMP. However, even if
you overconfigure ie. PIM+IGMP on DG interfaces to clients, as long as
you don't break the task objectives, you'll be fine. All the script will
probably do is show ip pim interface. As long as what the script is
looking for is here for each Routers, you're covered.
Router# show ip pim interface
Address Interface Ver/ Nbr Query DR DR
Mode Count Intvl Prior
10.1.0.1 GigabitEthernet0/0 v2/SD 0 30 1
10.1.0.1
10.6.0.1 GigabitEthernet0/1 v2/SD 1 30 1
10.6.0.2
10.2.0.1 ATM1/0.1 v2/SD 1 30 1
0.0.0.0
Many Thanks
Yemi Salau
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Alexander Belov
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 9:22 AM
To: 'mohamed ouamer'; 'Cisco certification'
Subject: RE: Multicast Question
I would go with only inter-router interfaces as other int's might be
igmp-s
- i.e. clients for the multicast..
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
mohamed ouamer
Sent: Friday, April 04, 2008 12:02 PM
To: Cisco certification
Subject: Multicast Question
Hi GS,
How to deal with the following question:
"Configure PIM between R1, R2 and R3"
Should we configure only PIM on the all interfaces, or just on
interfaces
connecting these routers?
Regards,
Mohamed.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu May 01 2008 - 08:25:50 ART