From: seyfert . (seyfert22@googlemail.com)
Date: Thu May 22 2008 - 22:58:36 ART
I dont have a clear view about the topology, would u describe it more
clearly...
whether R4 is attach to R5,R2, and R6..
may be..
You can use table to create a clear view of topology
ex:
R1 attached to x,y,z
etc...
..
tks
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 7:40 PM, Luca Hall <lhall@setnine.com> wrote:
> R2 mutually redistributes RIP<->OSPF
> R4 mutually redistributes EIGRP<->OSPF
>
> [R1]
> e0/0 |
> R
> I
> P
> | e0/0
> s0/0 -[R2]- s0/1
> | |
> O R
> S I
> P P
> F |
> | |
> s0/0 \ / s0/1
> [R6]-EIGRP--[R4]--RIP--[R5]
> e0/0 e0/0 e0/1 e0/0
>
> R1 is sending 10 routes to R2, R2 then sends them
> via RIP, redistributes them into OSPF and sends via OSPF.
>
> You want full reachability, my solution is set the RIP routes
> on R4 learned by R2 to AD 109 (distance exact match)
> to keep them in their own domain; then on R2 summarize them via OSPF
> so R4 wont set their AD set to 109, the summaries will be
> put into R4's routing table then redistributed into EIGRP.
>
> Is there any other/better ways to do this?
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART