From: Bill Eyer (beyer@optonline.net)
Date: Sat May 24 2008 - 09:43:35 ART
Most routing protocols use the link local address for exchanging hellos
and updates. Therefore in most scenarios they would have the same
effect. However, not enabling broadcast on the 2033:: subnet could
impact any IPV6 multicast if you have a requirement for it in real life.
I don't think IPV6 multicast is on the R&S blueprint yet.
Bill
ccie wrote:
> Hi experts,
>
>
>
> Is there is any difference between these implantations ?
>
>
>
> Int ser0/0/0
>
> frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::21E:4AFF:FE6B:FF3E 601 broadcast
>
> frame-relay map ipv6 2033:3:3:16::1 601 broadcast
>
>
>
> vs.
>
>
>
> int ser0/0/0
>
> frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::21E:4AFF:FE6B:FF3E 601 broadcast
>
> frame-relay map ipv6 2033:3:3:16::1 601
>
>
>
> Enabling broadcast for the same PVC twice or enabling it just once would
> achieve the same result?
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Amin
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Jun 02 2008 - 06:59:18 ART