From: rom raj (romraj1@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Jul 03 2008 - 10:19:06 ART
Hi Scott,
I meant that you would stay with them (Internetworkexpert) till next
Networkers.
Thanks,
Rom
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> Absolutely! :)
>
> Isn't that what Networkers is all about? Free clothing?!?!
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> rom
> raj
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 8:28 AM
> To: Scott Morris; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: DSCP and default PHB
>
> Hi Scott,
>
> Looking at your signature that you have moved to the other company. I just
> collected a T-Shirt (ipexpert) from you last week and you are now with the
> other vendor. Hope I can get a T-Shirt (Internetworkexpert) from you next
> year.
>
> All the best!
>
> Regards,
> Rom
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 2:15 PM, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>
> > Yes and no.
> >
> > You're correct about the Pak Priority concept in routers. That's a
> > coding issue. You won't see it down the line because routing
> > protocols (IGPs) are designed to be link-local in nature, so further
> routing isn't necessary.
> >
> > As for switches, if you enable mls qos, you can look at the queuing
> > details and see that hardware queuing kicks in. I don't know as I
> > have ever looked to see whether the IP Prec - to - hardware queue
> > mapping occurs if mls qos is not turned on though....
> >
> > Anyone ever looked? :) My 3750 seems to be clear about it not being
> > turned on.
> >
> > emanon-Bellerive#sh mls qos int f1/0/1 q
> > FastEthernet1/0/1
> > QoS is disabled. When QoS is enabled, following settings will be
> > applied Egress Priority Queue : disabled Shaped queue weights
> > (absolute) : 25 0 0 0 Shared queue weights : 25 25 25 25 The port
> > bandwidth limit : 100 The port is mapped to qset : 1
> >
> > emanon-Bellerive#
> >
> >
> > Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> > CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> > Senior CCIE Instructor
> >
> > smorris@internetworkexpert.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 705
> > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 705
> > 24/7 Support: http://forum.internetworkexpert.com
> > Live Chat: http://www.internetworkexpert.com/chat/
> >
> > Knowledge is power.
> > Power corrupts.
> > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> > Of Bill Eyer
> > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2008 6:42 AM
> > To: Tyson Scott
> > Cc: Morris, Jason L.; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> > Subject: Re: DSCP and default PHB
> >
> > I have also came across references that indicate that a routers "own"
> > packets for routing protocols, usually marked with ip prec 6 are
> > queued independently without enabling a queueing mechanism. This does
> > not seem to translate to the next-hop router though, in other words
> > each router specially queues it's own routing protocol packets but if
> > they go through a switch there is no special queueing. Off hand, I
> > can't think of a way to verify this.
> >
> > Bill
> >
> > Tyson Scott wrote:
> > > By default the DSCP field is not interpreted without turning on a
> > > queueing mechanism. By default FIFO.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Morris, Jason L.
> > > <Jasmorris@checkngo.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Just to clarify and dispel my ignorance...
> > >>
> > >> There is no 'default' 'per hope behavior' for a Cisco router or
> > >> switch that depends on DSCP markings? Those markings are just so
> > >> you can classify traffic and then manually configure PHB on each
> device
> right?
> > >> That's been my assumption up to this point but I was review some
> > >> QoS stuff in a buddies ONS - CCNP book and it inferred (or at least
> > >> made me
> > >> question) that the router was doing something different with EF
> > >> marked packets without explicitly being told to...
> > >>
> > >> That's not the case right? It doesn't by default, out of the box,
> > >> treat differently marked DSCP traffic differently?
> > >>
> > >> Jason Morris
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> ___________________________________________________________________
> > >> ____ Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > _ Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:53 ART