From: John (jgarrison1@austin.rr.com)
Date: Mon Jul 14 2008 - 14:01:52 ART
What a great point!!! Thanks for the help. Maybe one day I'll be able to
point out peoples ignorance of a subject by calling their questions "
ridiculous", instead of trying to clarify them. I guess that's easier than
not replying.
Again thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: Narbik Kocharians
To: John
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: Traffic shaping vs rate limit
Some times these questions get ridiculous, its like saying answer the
following questions:
exactly, did you get it right?
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:09 AM, John <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com> wrote:
Lets take a very ambigouis question. Make sure traffic on int x does not
exceed 256k.
Intx
traffic shape rate 256000 32000 0
VS
intx
rate-limit 256000 32000 32000 conform transmit exceed drop
I'm pretty sure I'm missing something to me these are the same
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
--
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Aug 04 2008 - 06:11:55 ART