From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Aug 16 2008 - 01:44:34 ART
It all depends on how many things you are doing, and how many DLCIs are
present on a particular interface.
In general, #2 will apply to ALL DLCIs on a particular
interface/subinterface without regard to the DLCI number.
#1, will allow you to apply specific details on a per-DLCI basis.
So it just depends on what you are looking to accomplish! Test it out
though. I'd be familiar with both!
HTH,
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Anant Tamgole
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2008 12:31 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Qos on Frame relay interfaces
Hi,
I have seen two ways of applying policy-map to frame-relay interfaces. What
is the difference between two and when to use which method.
1. Using map-class commad
2. Direct under the interface.
e.g.
1.
!
map-class frame-relay FR-CLASS
service-policy output <POLICY-MAP-NAME> !
int s0/0
frame-relay traffic-shaping
frame-relay class FR-CLASS
2.
int s0/0
service-policy output <POLICY-MAP-NAME>
Anant
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART