From: Igor M. (imanassypov@rogers.com)
Date: Sun Sep 21 2008 - 14:23:20 ART
Interesting thought, I was thinking of forcing all other sw's in topology to
become roots...
The guard option crossed my mind, but would that not also cripple my stp?
Thank you for your help, Narbik
--- On Sun, 9/21/08, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Switch not to become root w/o commands to change bridge priority
To: "Igor M." <imanassypov@rogers.com>
Cc: "Groupstudy R&S" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Received: Sunday, September 21, 2008, 12:34 PM
Have you thought of the:
Int f0/1
Spanning-tree guard root
Command??
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Igor M. <imanassypov@rogers.com> wrote:
Hi All,
How do you make sure that a switch would never become a root for a particular
vlan with a condition that you are not allowed to use any commands that
modify the bridge priority?
Thanks!
----------------------
I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
Network Architect
CI Investments
----------------------
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:19 ART