From: Jonny English (redkidneybeans@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 30 2008 - 08:54:50 ART
thanks for the reply.
ummm, this is stange. traffic is preferred over the frame-relay link, so we
shouldn't have the need for the ip mroute.
ah well, I've made up and labbed up different scenario's to try and drum
this in. But I could be wrong and the ip mroute might be needed for
something, not sure what though.
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
> You don't have problems with your multicasts taking a different path than
> the unicasts? Or perhaps you placed the multicast traffic on an interface
> that wasn't asked for. :)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Jonny English
> Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2008 1:54 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Question about IE Mock lab 2: only read if you've done mock 2, i
> don't want to spoil it for you
>
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering with task 5.1, why is there a static mroute on SW1?
> Multicast works for me if I don't have the ip mroute on, but I got marked
> down because I didn't have the mroute on SW1?
>
> Any ideas on when we have to use an ip mroute when doing multicast?
>
> thanks,
>
> --
> Thank You,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Thank You,Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:20 ART