From: Hasse (eriksson.hans@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 21 2008 - 13:28:43 ARST
I am realy sorry. I did not read all the conversation. I just did a
bad joke. I am not judging any one. So I am sorry and I do apologies
if I have offended any person. It is like the Lab read the complete
Lab before starting, same here, read the complete thread before doing
any comments.
Once more I do apologies.
21 okt 2008 kl. 12.54 skrev "Mohammed Naviwala" <monavy@gmail.com>:
> well hasse,
>
> this analogy was in very bad taste....................
>
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Hasse <eriksson.hans@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> A fake ccie are the same as a husband that are having sex with his
> wife every night, and she are telling her friends about her fake
> orgasm every night.
>
> Just my opinion. :-)
>
>
>
> 19 okt 2008 kl. 17.45 skrev "Muhammad Nasim"
> <muhammad.nasim@gmail.com>:
>
>
> You are correct Atlanta but I am really worried about the attitude
> of the
> recuriters and hiring authority that they simple denied a person for
> an
> interview.
>
> For example if a person is having 5+ years experience (good) and one
> person
> one year experince and CCIE the recuriter or the hiring guys will
> give the
> second person priority. What the HELL it is?
>
> Is there any Justice : (
>
> May be Barrack Obama will bring the justice in the field of
> networking : )
>
>
>
>
> 2008/10/19 Tony Schaffran (GS) <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
>
> I was just trying to add a little humor to the situation.
>
> Nothing personal.
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
>
> Sr. Network Consultant
>
> CCIE #11071
>
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
>
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
>
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
>
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Muhammad Nasim [mailto:muhammad.nasim@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Sunday, October 19, 2008 12:39 AM
> *To:* Tony Schaffran (GS)
> *Cc:* John; A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail); ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> *Subject:* Re: About time #22372
>
> hhaha Tony don't tell me you don't know guys who are starting their
> career of Network by switxhing from ACCOUNTS and other NON-IT
> professionals
> and getting their CCIE in less then TWO YEARS with NO HANDS ON
> Experience on
> ANY OF THE ROUTERS AND SWITCHES.
>
> It is true and I am confident those in the field of training of
> CCNA, CCNP
> AND CCIE & others know these guys.
>
> At least I taught one guy CCNA who was working as an ACCOUNTANT in the
> company and in the eveining he was taking classes from me.
>
> Hope this really give you what exactly is going on .
>
> Thanks
>
>
> 2008/10/19 Tony Schaffran (GS) <groupstudy@cconlinelabs.com>
>
> WOW!!
>
> Unable to subnet to CCIE in less than 2 years.
>
> That is quite a learning curve.
>
>
> Tony Schaffran
> Sr. Network Consultant
> CCIE #11071
> CCNP, CCNA, CCDA,
> NNCDS, NNCSS, CNE, MCSE
>
> www.cconlinelabs.com
> Your #1 choice for online Cisco rack rentals.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of
> John
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 4:59 PM
> To: A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail)
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: About time #22372
>
> In early 2007 I went on a job interview, and I had forgotten how to
> subnet.
> I
> was so embarrassed that I decided to recertify my CCNP. Then I
> found out
> I
> had to start over from CCNA to get it and I decided to go for CCIE. I
> took
> Narbiks prep for CCIE written and then read both volumes of routing, a
> switching book and then started on config guides and RFC's. I went
> through
> IE's technology labs 3 times. I started on their multiprotocol labs
> in
> November of 07. I failed my first attempt in January 08, but I knew
> that
> was
> coming. I came back and hit the racks hard for a few months and
> took itr
> again in August. Made lots of stupid mistakes and spent to much
> time on
> one
> issue, failed again. Came back more rack time a few mock labs.
> Passed
> on
> Oct 18th. Thats it in a nutshell
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: A.G. Ananth Sarma (GMail)
> To: John
> Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2008 3:56 AM
> Subject: Re: About time #22372
>
>
> Congrats. Tell ypur success story in detail.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ananth
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 9:09 AM, John <jgarrison1@austin.rr.com>
> wrote:
>
> Peeps
>
> Thanks for all the help. It was close, real close, but I won this
> round.
> I
> still don't know sh*t but will endeavor to keep enlightening myself.
>
> John Garrison
>
> CCIE#22372
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------
> Regards,
>
> A.G. Ananthasubramania Sarma
> ananth.sarma@gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Muhammad Nasim
> Network Engineer
> Saudi Arabia
>
>
>
>
> --
> Muhammad Nasim
> Network Engineer
> Saudi Arabia
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards
>
> Mohammed Abdul Razzaq
>
>
> If you are not small enough to loose, you are not big enough to win..
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:21 ARST