Re: Priority List Usage

From: Dennis Worth (dennis.worth@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 27 2008 - 16:41:27 ARST

Looks good to me.

Rack1R1(config)#priority-list 1 protocol http ?
  high
  medium
  normal
  low

Sh ver

System image file is "flash:c2600-adventerprisek9-mz.124-10a.bin"

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think the second one is a command is it?
>
> priority-list 1 protocol http ?
> % Unrecognized command
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jason Madsen <madsen.jason@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone knows the difference between the following
> > priority list examples:
> >
> >
> > priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 80
> >
> > and
> >
> > priority-list 1 protocol http high
> >
> > I'm a bit tired so I could be missing the obvious here, but the config'
> > guide and command reference aren't of much help in this matter and the
> two
> > statements pretty much seem the same to me.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jason
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Dennis Worth

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:23 ARST