Re: Typical lab wording

From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2009 - 18:08:38 ARST

Totally agree with Anthony.

On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Anthony Sequeira <
asequeira@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:

> I think Marko was just trying to get you to talk more about IP Precedence
> and the DSCP compatibility with it.
>
> Simply saying one uses three bits and the other uses six is not really
> enough.
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626, CCSI #23251
> Senior CCIE Instructor
>
> asequeira@internetworkexpert.com
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
> On Jan 17, 2009, at 1:23 PM, TCP IP4 wrote:
>
> I can understand DSCP is back compatible with IPP with the extension
>> of the 3 more bits. Where are the incompatibility of IPP with DSCP?
>> Can you please share any links? Thanks a lot!
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Marko Milivojevic <markom@markom.info>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 03:26, TCP IP4 <tcp.ip4@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> First come out is 3 bits vs 6 bits. Do I need to drill more?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Let's continue on the same note :-)
>>>
>>> How does that help you, especially when combined with other
>>> technologies that still use only 3 bits? Can you name those
>>> technologies and explain their compatibility or incompatibility with
>>> DSCP?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Marko
>>> CCIE #18427 (SP)
>>> My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
>>>
>>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST