From: Anthony Faria (tfaria72@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 09 2009 - 16:45:40 ARST
This will not break NDA what protocols are you talking about. I am not
asking about the questions. Whatever is on the blueprint will be the
protocols you will be tested on. You would be surprised how many businesses
and companies still run older technologies. I am not meaning this mean I am
just curious what protocols you are talking about. You can say I got ospf on
the test and framerelay that is not breaking the NDA just dont say the
question.
Tony
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Kasper Adel <karim.adel@gmail.com> wrote:
> Its not about hard or not, i just was not prepared for legacy protocols and
> i dont think i should waste time on it, there are a lot of other stuff to
> cover.
>
> I am trying to put priorities, thats all
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Anthony Faria <tfaria72@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I would worry about why it was hard and not that it was hard. There is the
>> possibility to get it again. The point is to be able to do anything they
>> throw at you.
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Nikhil Behl <nibehl@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kasper,
>>>
>>> I understand your point. I just passed my CCIE (RnS) in 3rd attempt about
>>> a week ago. My brother is a double CCIE (Security and Voice track). When he
>>> appeared for his 2nd attempt in Voice, he got the same lab which he got in
>>> his 1st attempt. So I would say chances are very slim but still you should
>>> look into your weaker areas.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nikhil Behl
>>> CCIE# 23335 (Routing & Switching)
>>> Cisco Tac Engineer - CATS/LAN-Switching
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kasper Adel" <karim.adel@gmail.com>
>>> To: "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk@gmail.com>
>>> Cc: <ron.wilkerson@gmail.com>; "vinny" <vinny@foxmail.com>; "Cisco
>>> certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>> Sent: Monday, February 09, 2009 8:06 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Repeated Exam
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> You guys did not get my point.
>>>>
>>>> I am not waiting for the exam to repeat, i do not want to get the same
>>>> exam
>>>> on my second attempt, there were legacy technologies there that i was
>>>> surprised to see so i hope on my second attempt i would get new stuff
>>>> that i
>>>> am already more familiar with.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Exactly Ron, at the end of the day he has to work as a CCIE.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 4:53 AM, <ron.wilkerson@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Sorry to say that I actually met someone who passed due to his
>>>>>> strategy.
>>>>>> He memorized the questions from his first attempt and kept going back
>>>>>> until
>>>>>> he got the same lab. Took him about 6 tries.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There aren't that many versions of the lab. This was back in 04...so
>>>>>> maybe there are more versions now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have less respect for him though...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: "vinny" <vinny@foxmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 13:50:30
>>>>>> To: Kasper Adel<karim.adel@gmail.com>; Cisco certification<
>>>>>> ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>>>>>> Subject: Re: Repeated Exam
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, I guess there are limited number of exams(say it is N). And I
>>>>>> suppose Cisco will not reuse an exam that has been previously taken by
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>> So the chance of getting a repeated exam is after you have attempted
>>>>>> all
>>>>>> versions and failed them all. At your N+1 attempt, you will get a
>>>>>> repeated
>>>>>> exam for 100%. so get yourself enough money (That is N x $1300), you
>>>>>> will
>>>>>> definetly pass eventually. ^_^ It all depends on how big the N is...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2009-02-09
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> vinny
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 7"<~HK#: Kasper Adel
>>>>>> 7"KMJ1<d#: 2009-02-09 12:07:12
>>>>>> JU<~HK#: Cisco certification
>>>>>> 3-KM#:
>>>>>> VwLb#: Repeated Exam
>>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I hope my question doesnt break an NDA.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I didnt make it in the first attempt and i am wondering what are the
>>>>>> chances
>>>>>> of me seeing the same exam i saw the first time in my second attempt?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Kas
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus
>>>>>> signature database 3837 (20090208) __________
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.eset.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Narbik Kocharians
>>>>> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>>>>> www.MicronicsTraining.com
>>>>> www.Net-Workbooks.com
>>>>> Sr. Technical Instructor
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST