From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Feb 10 2009 - 19:57:23 ARST
The 50 site full mesh requirement makes that difficult to scale...
Something's got to give.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Alexei Monastyrnyi <alexeim73@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about L2 VPNs? That would hide your infrastructure quite well.
>
> A.
>
> Ronnie Angello wrote:
>>
>> That would be more difficult as the provider must participate in
>> customer routing. It sounds like you are more interested in an
>> overlay design where you control all of your routing. I suppose you
>> could NAT everything but that wouldn't scale well and would be a
>> management nightmare. Maybe MPLS VPN isn't the right solution for
>> your requirements...
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:26 PM, voice guru <guru.voice@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Steve,
>>>
>>> We already planned for it, but GET will not help us hiding the internal
>>> IP
>>> Schema but yes it provides more security over the WAN.
>>>
>>> We must hide the IP Addresses from SP. any more Ideas.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Guru
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:44:10 ARST