From: cisco boy (xeliminator@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 05 2009 - 10:56:38 ARST
2009/3/5 Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Hi,
>
> You have tried to post to a GroupStudy.com certification mailing list.
> Because
> the server does not recognize you as a confirmed poster, you will be
> required
> to authenticate that you are using a valid e-mail address and are not a
> spammer. By confirming this e-mail you certify that you are not sending
> Unsolicited Bulk Email (UBE).
>
> PLEASE DO NOT SEND YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE AGAIN! BY CONFIRMING THIS EMAIL
> YOUR ORIGINAL MESSAGE (WHICH IS NOW QUEUED IN THE SERVER) WILL BE POSTED.
>
>
> By confirming this e-mail you also certify the following:
>
> 1. The message does NOT break Cisco's Non-Disclosure requirements.
>
> 2. The message is NOT designed to advertise a commercial product.
>
> 3. You understand all postings become property of GroupStudy.com
>
> 4. You have searched the archives prior to posting.
>
> 5. The message is NOT inflammatory.
>
> 6. The message is NOT a test message.
>
> To confirm, simply reply to this message. No editing is necessary. Once
> confirmed, you will be able to post without additional confirmations.
>
>
> Welcome to GroupStudy.com!
>
>
> First time posters to GroupStudy.com are required to agree to the
> GroupStudy terms and conditions.
> Replying to this email, certifies you have read and agree to the GroupStudy
> posting guidelines and terms and conditions.
>
> --- Original Message Follows ---
>
> Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:19:31 +0100
> Subject: BGP selcection proces
> From: cisco boy <xeliminator@gmail.com>
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Group,
>
> I 'm having a problem influencing the selction process in BGP.
> Anyone knows why the router would prefer the second route ?
>
> BGP table version is 656, local router ID is 10.235.95.6
> Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i -
> internal,
> r RIB-failure, S Stale
> Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
>
> Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
> *> 10.0.0.0/30 10.234.185.57 4294967294 10 0 65009
> 65000 4809 65021 ?
> * i 10.235.95.2 4294967295 100 100
> 65000 4809 65021 ?
>
>
> Second route has a better Weight, better Loc Pref shorter path and I
> also made sure that the next hop is reachable.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART