From: Scott M Vermillion (scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com)
Date: Tue Mar 10 2009 - 15:31:26 ARST
Hi Marish,
This is definitely an EIGRP "gotcha!"  I confess that I was scratching  
my head on this one for a bit there myself (although half of that was  
just trying to decipher the ASCII art!).  Recall that BW is cumulative  
along the path to the destination network but BW is simply the lowest  
reported value along the entire end-to-end path - it is *not*  
calculated cumulatively along each segment!  If you notice, the delta  
between your RD as reported by R6 to R1 and your FD as calculated at  
R1 is exactly 2560, which is 10 x 256, which is simply DLY x 256 for  
that cumulative segment along the path.
So when you say "10000000/100000 = 100 + 10 = 110 X 256 = 28160  R1  
distane to  R6," it is important to note that there really isn't a  
"distance" from R1 to R6, per se.  Consider if you were on the R3 CLI  
and looking at the route for the network segment between R6 and SW1.   
Now further consider that the R3<->R1 segment was GIG-E and likewise  
the R6<->SW1 segment was GIG-E.  Keep the R1<->R6 segment as Fast-E.   
Now the lowest reported BW along the path is obviously R1<->R6, so  
your "distance" between those two routers is no longer a fixed 2560.   
See what I mean?  It's all relative to where you're looking at what  
with EIGRP, because the segment you're contemplating may or may not  
represent the BW bottleneck along the path for a given route.
Simply put, BW only factors into the metric once and it is the lowest  
value from end-to-end.
Regards,
Scott
(Also just BTW, isn't it the case that one of the segments along the  
path from R6 to 155.1.37.0/24 is actually 10 Mbps vs. all Fast-E?   
That's the only way the RD from R6 as seen on R1 makes any sense to me  
[10^7/10,000 = 1000, then add delay of 100 for E plus delay of 10 for  
Fast-E, all x 256 = 284160])
On Mar 10, 2009, at 12:25 , marish shah wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
>    Yesterday  I was facing  problem with eigrp lab.problem is reladed
> to FD (fesible distance) AD (advertise distance)
>
> ok Here is my senario
>
>
>               Serial 1/3  155.1.13.3          155.1.13.1 Serial 1/0
> Fa0/0 155.1.146.1                                    155.1.146.6  
> Fa0/0.146
>
> R3------------------------------------------------------ 
> R1 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------R6
>
> |
> |
>             |Fa0/0
> 155.1.37.3
>    |
>
> |
> 155.1.67.6 Fa0/0.67         |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>
> |
> |
>             |      155.1.37.7 Fa
> 1/3                                         155.1.67.7 Vlan
> 67                                                |
>
> |---------------------------------------------------------- 
> SW1 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------|
>
> R1 fastethernet 0/0  is conectd with R6 Fastethernet 0/0.146
> R1 Serial 1/0 is conected with R3 Serial 1/3
> R3 fastethernet0/0 is conected with SW1 fastethernet 1/3
> R6 fastethernet 0/0.67 is conected with SW fastethernet 1/6
>
> Now I enable eigrp 100 on all routers.
>
> After runing eigrp 100 I try to calculate FD and AD my traget is   
> interface
> between R3 & SW1 (155.1.37.0)  I'm on router 1
>
> Here is sh  ip  eigrp topology on R1
>
> R1#sh ip eigrp topology
>
> P 155.1.37.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 286720
>        via 155.1.146.6 (286720/284160), FastEthernet0/0 ------ 
> primary path
>        via 155.1.13.3 (2195456/281600), Serial1/1      -------  
> Backup path
> here u see I have two paths to reach 155.1.37.0 so now decision on  
> FD I'm
> get lowest FD ( 286720) from 155.1.146.6 so this my primary  path.
> On this point every thing is OK  I  calculate my AD ( 281600) the  
> result is
> same.But when I try to calculate my FD on router 1 my mind stuck.AS  
> I know
> for FD first we take our AD , second we take our distance ( R1 to  
> R6)  then
> plus both  and we get our FD.But its not work.
>
> On R1 MY FD is 286720 for calculate my distance to R6
>
>
> Rack1R1#sh interfaces fastEthernet 0/0
>
> BW 100000 Kbit, DLY 100 usec,
>
> 10^7/BW + DELAY x 256
>
> 10^7= 10000000
> 10000000/100000 = 100 + 10 = 110 X 256 = 28160  R1 distane to  R6
>
> Now 28160 + 284160 = 312320  but as u see in topology table FD is  
> 286720
> .................
> So how can I calculate my FD  ?
>
>
> your suggestion is really helpful to me.
>
> Regards,
> Thanks.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:04 ART