Re: OSPF Failover to another Router

From: Wouter Prins (wp@null0.nl)
Date: Wed Mar 25 2009 - 17:05:52 ART

• Next message: Tony Varriale: "RE: Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: WFQ vs CBWFQ for class Class-Default"
• Maybe in reply to: naveen M S: "OSPF Failover to another Router"
• Next in thread: Lloyd Ardoin: "RE: OSPF Failover to another Router"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Smells like the backup command?

2009/3/25 naveen M S <navin.ms@gmail.com>

> Group,
>
> This is the task I have.
>
> R5 (S0/0)-----(FrameRelay)------R2
> | E0/0
> |
> |
> R4
>
> 1. R5 should maintain adjacency with R2 as long as FrameRelay is Up.
> 2. If FrameRelay link goes down, form a new adjacency with R4 on Ethernet
> link.
> 3. Solution should be dynamic. When FR link is Up, no adjacency should
> exist b/n R5 and R4.
> 4. The Ethernet interface b/n R5 and R4 should be always up.
> 5. Neighbor statements are permitted.
>
> All ideas are welcome.
> Naveen.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Wouter Prins
wp@null0.nl
0x301FA912
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: Tony Varriale: "RE: Dumps are already out for open-ended questions!!"
• Previous message: Petr Lapukhov: "Re: WFQ vs CBWFQ for class Class-Default"
• Maybe in reply to: naveen M S: "OSPF Failover to another Router"
• Next in thread: Lloyd Ardoin: "RE: OSPF Failover to another Router"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Apr 06 2009 - 06:44:07 ART