Re: MQC priority inside class-default

I will go for the second one

coz you shape then under shaping you specify priority within the shaped
traffic

but again why you put shape average and shape peak ?!!

remove shape average you will have the same result !!!!

Salah

On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 11:09 PM, naveen M S <navin.ms_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Group,
>
> Is there a difference b/n the following two configs ? My task is to give
> VOIP traffic (with DSCP=EF) of 64kbps priority on DLCI 502.
>
> *Config-1:*
>
> class-map VOIP
> match dscp ef
> !
> policy-map SHAPE_502
> class VOIP
> priority 64
> class class-default
> shape peak 128000 6400 6400
> shape adaptive 128000
> !
> map-class frame-relay DLCI_502
> service-policy SHAPE_502
> !
> interface s0/0/0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> class DLCI_502
> *
> **Config-2:*
>
> class-map VOIP
> match dscp ef
> !
> policy-map LLQ
> class VOIP
> priority 64
> !
> policy-map SHAPE_502
> class class-default
> shape peak 128000 6400 6400
> shape adaptive 128000
> shape fr-voice-adapt
> service-policy LLQ
> !
> map-class frame-relay DLCI_502
> service-policy SHAPE_502
> !
> interface s0/0/0
> frame-relay interface-dlci 502
> class DLCI_502
>
> Thanks,
> Naveen.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Apr 04 2009 - 23:39:13 ART