Re: OSPF Distribute list.

Yes that is what i was referring to. That is the behavior. If the other
router or routers were in another area, like area 0, and you wanted to have
all the routers in your area to receive the external routes but not the
routers in area 0 or the other areas behind area 0, you could even configure
the "summary-address not-advertise" on the ABR, only if that area is
configured as NSSA.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> @Narbik i tried the summary-address not advertise solution. with R3 in
> NSSA. i put the summary address not advertise command in R4's ospf
> process. 6.6.0.0/24 disappears from R2 and R3 .!
> Thanking You
>
> Yours Sincerely
>
> Divin Mathew John
> divinjohn_at_gmail.com
> divin_at_dide3d.com
> http://www.dide3d.com
> +91 9945430983
> +91 9846697191
> +974 5008916
> PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
> Sent from Bangalore, KA, India
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Divin Mathew John <divinjohn_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > maybe.! just tell us wht ur solution would be in multiarea OSPF!
> > Thanking You
> >
> > Yours Sincerely
> >
> > Divin Mathew John
> > divinjohn_at_gmail.com
> > divin_at_dide3d.com
> > http://www.dide3d.com
> > +91 9945430983
> > +91 9846697191
> > +974 5008916
> > PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
> > Sent from Bangalore, KA, India
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 2:43 AM, Paul Cosgrove <paul.cosgrove_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> In this scenario are you allowed to use two different OSPF processes on
> R4?
> >>
> >> Paul.
> >>
> >> Divin Mathew John wrote:
> >>>
> >>> i have the following Scenario.
> >>>
> >>> R2<-----R4---->R3
> >>> |
> >>> |
> >>> R1
> >>>
> >>> now.. R4 is running OSPF and EIGRP . Redistributing mutually. R2 and
> >>> R3 are getting all the routes. R2 and R3 runnning OSPF. R1 is running
> >>> EIGRP.
> >>> Now say ... R1 has 6.6.0.0/24 in its routing table. While
> >>> redistributing at R4 i dont want the 6.6.0.0/24 to be advertised to R3
> >>> but R2 shud be able to reach the 6.6.0.0/24. I know that u can use a
> >>> distribute list in on R3 and filter the routes. but can something be
> >>> done on R4 to make 6.6.0.0 filtered towards R3 and not towards R2.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanking You
> >>>
> >>> Yours Sincerely
> >>>
> >>> Divin Mathew John
> >>> divinjohn_at_gmail.com
> >>> divin_at_dide3d.com
> >>> http://www.dide3d.com
> >>> +91 9945430983
> >>> +91 9846697191
> >>> +974 5008916
> >>> PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK @ http://www.dide3d.com/divin_Public_PGP_key.txt
> >>> Sent from Bangalore, KA, India
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining.com
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net