Re: CCIE Wireless

It was your message. Perhaps I read more into it with your reference to
the "CCIE race". But your quote:

"IMO, Dial and SNA are in the same class as my initial Brocade certs,
NT4 MCSE and 4.1 CNE. Great for drinkin' and telling stories but
shouldn't be considered in a CCIE race."

So I suppose, judging by your inline comments below, the question should
be: What exactly do you define as the "CCIE race"?

If we don't know we are racing how do we know who wins? And just
because someone possesses a vast collection of knowledge that you do not
have or deem current and/or relevant, why discount that?

Meh...

Scott

Tony Varriale wrote:
> Inline...
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Scott Morris [mailto:swm_at_emanon.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 10:25 PM
> To: Tony Varriale
> Cc: 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: Re: CCIE Wireless
>
>
>> And I'd agree with that about skillsets. But just what exact insight do
>> you have about someone who has ONLY an ISP/Dial, or SNA/Blue, or
>> WAN-Switching or Design CCIE to be able to pass any judgement whatsoever
>> about what should count or not?
>>
>
> Pass which judgement?
>
>
>> That's inane.
>>
>
> Because?
>
>
>> I don't take it personally at all, but at the same time I cannot believe
>> anyone would make brash accusations like that about someone's knowledge
>> or capabilities.
>>
>
> What was brash?
>
>
>> Is it different than wondering about the people who
>> hang out on lists like this but yet don't have their CCIE and don't
>> appear to be actively moving towards it either?
>>
>
> Of course not. The original topic was counting ACTIVE CCIE tracks for the
> CCIE race. Nothing more nothing less.
>
>
>> I'm pretty sure that osmosis doesn't work in that fashion.
>>
>
> Not sure how biology is relevant to the topic at hand...but ok.
>
>
>> But why make comments like that?
>>
>
> Which comments? Where are you going with this?

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 07 2009 - 23:55:38 ART