Re: Need help in QOS

From: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 May 2009 02:13:12 -0400

Thinking out loud here and way too tired ... sorry if this is too far off.

Any chance that configuring nested service policies will provide more
scale? I do not know the limit to the number of nested policies within a
parent policy ... Basically you could create one policy-map per customer.
Add this to a parent policy-map with shaping configured.

Another thought might be to configure qos on a per customer basis and shape,
protect, and remark all packets as needed on a per customer basis. On the
uplink, simply configure a single policy which provides different qos levels
for all traffic going.

You could provide 6 or 7 classes for customers, and keep at least one class
for net management. Just a thought ...

Not sure this helps much ... time for my bed time ... in NJ, it is a bit too
late for me. Have a good night,

Andrew Lee Lissitz

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:52 AM, Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi again,
>
> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 3:40 PM, hafiz atif <oops.com_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I can't change the speed to 10 mbps because we are planning to increase
> the
> > speed upto 16mbps.
>
> In that case, even 100Mbps is better than 1Gbps. Can you interface do
> 100M, or 1000M only? I appreciate that some 1000BASE-x interfaces are
> 1000-only.
>
> cheers,
> Dale
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 17 2009 - 02:13:12 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART