Re: Etherchannel Issue

From: Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:46:27 +1000

Hi,

On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> I have heard that a few times in various products although I have never actually tried it. I have always kept it the same on both ends

Well, put me on the sceptics register :-)

I had a quick look at the Wireshark filters for LACP and PagP and
couldn't see an obvious field for the logical unit # to be propagated
to the other side during negotiation.

Guilty until proven innocent, wrong until proven true etc. It's now on
my "To do" list, but it's waaaay down at #31 -- right behind "learn
MPLS" at position #29 and "have a shower" at #30 ;-)

cheers,
Dale

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun May 24 2009 - 15:46:27 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART