Re: One Misconception about lab

Guys,
      I'm a little confused on this. For every single lab out there
regardless of the provider, you learn to use "no frame inv" to prevent the
interface or DLCI from answering any requests that it receives. I
understand how this works and I understand why this command alone can meet
any requirements for "not using any dynamic mappings". The documentation on
CCO is vague and Internet opinions are varied on "no arp frame-". I was
under the impression that this command prevented the router from initiating
requests. I always use both as a sanity check even though I'm completely
aware the second is not technically necessary. It's just cleaner to me. Am
I totally mistaken? Is "no arp frame-" a legacy or depreciated command? Or
do I understand it correctly? Please don't tell me I'm missing a
fundamental here....

Charles

                                                                                                                                 
  From: Anthony Faria <tfaria72_at_gmail.com>
                                                                                                                                 
  To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
                                                                                                                                 
  Cc: Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>, Charles.Henson_at_regions.com, Persio
              Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com>, Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
                                                                                                                                 
  Date: 07/23/2009 08:39
                                                                                                                                 
  Subject: Re: One Misconception about lab
                                                                                                                                 

LOL that will fix it. does nothing arp frame

On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:58 PM, Narbik Kocharians
<narbikk_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> One thing you are missing is the "no arp frame" that you have in your
> configuration.
>
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Kewl - Like I said as long as you are comfortable and you know why you
> are
> > doing it. Sounds like you did and you got the digits to prove it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:26 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > For a reason that shall remain undisclosed, I needed to reboot one of
> my
> > > routers with about 20 minutes left. Was I nervous? Of course not...
;-)
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining.com
> Sr. Technical Instructor
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 23 2009 - 09:01:22 ART