Re: FYI - CCIE Lab Prototype Review -

From: Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:00:13 -0400

Addressed on the blog.

On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 8:37 AM, Cisco League <ciscoleague_at_googlemail.com>wrote:

> I read your blog.....
> None of security measures are enough if the man having the control and
> authority of the test centre wants to compromise it.
> Who will be running the test centres? Will they not be run by the local
> test
> centre owners? Are they going to be special and new kind of centres and not
> where the written exams are done? If later is the case then it's not going
> to happen anytime soon and will need huge investment.
> Otherwise I don't see any reason why any of the security measures mentioned
> in your blog are enough to safeguard the integrity of the exam. Frisking a
> person and keeping the ID on table doesnt secure any exam.
> Cisco already has fingerprints,signature, digital photographs, 2 IDs in
> place for rest of the non-lab (written) exams in place. Did that make the
> exams less vulnerable? If it did I would have been happier doing CCNP
> rather
> than investing huge sum on money and thousands of hours and my personal
> life
> in pursuing CCIE.
>
> On Sat, Aug 8, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Addressed in depth on my blog.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Aug 08 2009 - 09:00:13 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:56 ART