Re: Tc minimum QoS vs Task working vs Lab

Thanks Iwan, Nathan for the posts.

Just as a side note, for anyone searching, the device im using is an
emulated 3600 but the same output was achieved via INE racks 2611.

I guess I should ask the proctor "Should I set Tc to the actual minimum, or
what the website says is the minimum?"

Cheers,
Martin

On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:02 AM, Iwan Hoogendoorn <iwan_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> Just like Nathan said ...
> 10ms is minimum TC
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Iwan Hoogendoorn
> CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
> Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:30 AM, Martin Hogan
> <martin.john.hogan_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> >
> > Task: Adjust policy so that Tc is minimum.
> >
> > For Tc, 4ms, or 10 ms?
> >
> > Service-policy output: TESTPOL
> >
> > Class-map: class-default (match-any)
> > 1 packets, 24 bytes
> > 5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
> > Match: any
> > Traffic Shaping
> > Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
> > Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
> > 512000/512000 512 2048 2048 4 256
> >
> >
> > Example is INE lab solution guide says 10ms (via setting the Bc) I think
> 4ms
> > is less then 10, but 10 is the "optimal" often quoted.
> >
> > Of course I would ask the proctor but this is playing on my mind, so im
> > wondering what the group thinks.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Oct 04 2009 - 10:07:09 ART