Hi Iwan,
this is what happens :
PE1#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
PE1(config)#mpls ldp router-id loopback 0
PE1(config)#mpls label protocol ldp
PE1(config)#
PE1#
PE2#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
PE2(config)#mpls ldp router-id loopback 0
PE2(config)#mpls label protocol ldp
PE2(config)#
PE3#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
PE3(config)#mpls ldp router-id loopback 0
PE3(config)#mpls label protocol ldp
PE3(config)#
PE4#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
PE4(config)#mpls ldp router-id loopback 0
PE4(config)#mpls label protocol ldp
PE4(config)#
PE4#sh mpls forwardi
E4#clear mpls ldp neighbor *
PE4#
*Oct 12 19:53:32.979: %LDP-5-CLEAR_NBRS: Clear LDP neighbors (*) by  
console
*Oct 12 19:53:32.979: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 3.3.3.3:0 (2) is  
DOWN (User cleared session manually)
*Oct 12 19:53:32.979: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 1.1.1.1:0 (1) is  
DOWN (User cleared session manually)
*Oct 12 19:53:35.151: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 3.3.3.3:0 (3) is UP
*Oct 12 19:53:38.087: %LDP-5-NBRCHG: LDP Neighbor 1.1.1.1:0 (4) is UP
PE4#sh mpls forwarding-table
Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing   Next Hop
Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
16     No Label      3.3.3.3/32        23939         Fa3/0       
172.16.34.3
17     No Label      2.2.2.2/32        0             Fa1/0       
172.16.14.1
        No Label      2.2.2.2/32        0             Fa3/0       
172.16.34.3
18     No Label      1.1.1.1/32        0             Fa1/0       
172.16.14.1
19     No Label      172.16.24.0/24    0             Fa1/0       
172.16.14.1
        No Label      172.16.24.0/24    0             Fa3/0       
172.16.34.3
20     No Label      172.16.13.0/24    0             Fa3/0       
172.16.34.3
21     No Label      172.16.12.0/24    0             Fa1/0       
172.16.14.1
22     No Label      172.16.23.0/24    0             Fa3/0       
172.16.34.3
23     No Label      192.168.2.0/24    0             Fa1/0       
172.16.14.1
        No Label      192.168.2.0/24    0             Fa3/0       
172.16.34.3
PE4#
On 12/10/2009, at 20:30 , Iwan Hoogendoorn wrote:
> Hi Marcel,
>
> Can you please add the folowing commands to your PE's:
>
> mpls ldp router-id loopback 0
> mpls label protocol ldp
>
> Please tell me what happens...
>
> -- 
> Regards,
>
> Iwan Hoogendoorn
> CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
> Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Marcel Lammerse  
> <m.lammerse_at_mac.com> wrote:
>> Configs and diagram attached. Unfortunately I can't draw ascii  
>> diagrams..
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/10/2009, at 20:48 , Rick Mur wrote:
>>
>>> Indeed, please post configs and a small overview of your setup.
>>> Have you tried clearing the LDP neighbor sessions, doing a 'clear  
>>> ip route
>>> *' or even reloading all the involved routers?
>>> LDP sometimes has this strange thing of not working 100% in IOS.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Rick Mur
>>> CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider)
>>> Sr. Support Engineer  IPexpert, Inc.
>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>>
>>> On 11 okt 2009, at 11:34, Iwan Hoogendoorn wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would also like to see the config and the topo.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iwan Hoogendoorn
>>>> CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
>>>> Sr. Support Engineer   IPexpert, Inc.
>>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Marcel Lammerse  
>>>> <m.lammerse_at_mac.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Experts,
>>>>>
>>>>> here I have a load-balanced path between directly connected ldp  
>>>>> speakers
>>>>> :
>>>>>
>>>>> PE4#sh mpls forwarding-table 192.168.2.0
>>>>> Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing    
>>>>> Next Hop
>>>>> Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
>>>>> 22     25            192.168.2.0/24    0             Fa1/0
>>>>> 172.16.14.1
>>>>>   23            192.168.2.0/24    0             Fa3/0       
>>>>> 172.16.34.3
>>>>> PE4#
>>>>>
>>>>> PE4#sh mpls ldp bindings 192.168.2.0 24 detail
>>>>> lib entry: 192.168.2.0/24, rev 22, chkpt: none
>>>>>    local binding:  label: 22 (owner LDP)
>>>>>      Advertised to:
>>>>>      1.1.1.1:0              3.3.3.3:0
>>>>>    remote binding: lsr: 1.1.1.1:0, label: 25
>>>>>    remote binding: lsr: 3.3.3.3:0, label: 23
>>>>>    route information: state: none, table: default,
>>>>>      next-hop: 172.16.14.1, remote label: 25
>>>>>    route information: state: none, table: default,
>>>>>      next-hop: 172.16.34.3, remote label: 23
>>>>>
>>>>> If I change the ldp sessions to t-ldp, and keep everything else  
>>>>> the
>>>>> same, the labels seem to disappear and traffic appears to go out  
>>>>> untagged :
>>>>>
>>>>> PE4#sh mpls forwarding-table 192.168.2.0
>>>>> Local  Outgoing      Prefix            Bytes Label   Outgoing    
>>>>> Next Hop
>>>>> Label  Label or VC   or Tunnel Id      Switched      interface
>>>>> 22     No Label      192.168.2.0/24    0             Fa1/0
>>>>> 172.16.14.1
>>>>>   No Label      192.168.2.0/24    0             Fa3/0       
>>>>> 172.16.34.3
>>>>> PE4#
>>>>>
>>>>> PE4#sh mpls ldp bindings 192.168.2.0 24 detail
>>>>> lib entry: 192.168.2.0/24, rev 22, chkpt: none
>>>>>    local binding:  label: 22 (owner LDP)
>>>>>      Advertised to:
>>>>>      3.3.3.3:0              1.1.1.1:0
>>>>>    remote binding: lsr: 3.3.3.3:0, label: 23
>>>>>    remote binding: lsr: 1.1.1.1:0, label: 25
>>>>>    route information: state: none, table: default,
>>>>>      next-hop: 172.16.14.1, remote label: <----- no label
>>>>>    route information: state: none, table: default,
>>>>>      next-hop: 172.16.34.3, remote label: <----- no label
>>>>> PE4#
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm a bit confused by this. I would have expected the traffic to
>>>>> continue to be labeled and the labels to remain the same.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can anyone shed some light on why this happens?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Marcel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Iwan Hoogendoorn
>>>> CCIE #13084 (R&S / Security / SP)
>>>> Sr. Support Engineer   IPexpert, Inc.
>>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Oct 12 2009 - 20:44:24 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:50:59 ART