Re: Quick VSS Question -

From: garry baker <baker.garry_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:03:38 +0300

I run these in 'standalone' mode, and also have some in 'vss' mode

SF_1#sh inventory
NAME: "WS-C6506-E", DESCR: "Cisco Systems Catalyst 6500 6-slotChassis
System"
PID: WS-C6506-E , VID: V02, SN: SAL1232ZHJS

NAME: "5", DESCR: "VS-S720-10G 5 ports Supervisor Engine 720 10GE Rev. 2.0"
PID: VS-S720-10G , VID: V02, SN: SAL123738J0

NAME: "msfc sub-module of 5", DESCR: "VS-F6K-MSFC3 MSFC3 Daughterboard Rev.
1.0"
PID: VS-F6K-MSFC3 , VID: , SN: SAL12383UHS

SF_1#sh switch virtual
Switch Mode : Standalone

On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Zeeshan Sanaullah <
zeeshansanaullah_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Group
>
> Just a Quick question regarding VSS.
>
> Can the VSS Pair act as separate redundant switches. Or is that it the
> Supervisor is built to act in VSS Mode only.
>
> I have two 6506-E with VS-S720-10G-3C. I want them to act as separate
> switches
> like if there is no VSS capability.
>
> I will add the VSS configuration later on.
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Zeeshan Sanaullah , CCIE #25196 (R&S)
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live: Friends get your Flickr, Yelp, and Digg updates when they
> e-mail
> you.
>
> http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/see-it-in-action/soci
> al-network-basics.aspx?ocid=PID23461::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-xm:SI_SB_3:092010
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Garry L. Baker
"There is no 'patch' for stupidity." - www.sqlsecurity.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Oct 19 2009 - 12:03:38 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Nov 01 2009 - 07:51:00 ART